Expanded derivative theories built from admitted DPA conduct
Plaintiff bars with prior RTX standing (Motley Rice, Izard Kindall & Raabe, Milberg Weiss, Berman DeValerio Pease) can use the public DPA admissions plus the Vladimir Gusinsky Del. Sup. Ct. opinion to scaffold next-generation derivative pleadings against any director whose service window touches the admitted conduct. Ekambram (D. Del. 1:26-cv-00081, filed 2026-01-23) is the post-settlement existence proof. Very likely continues to yield filings through the DPA monitor term.
Expand D&O indemnification disclosure and board-level audit-committee scope around FCPA/AECA conduct
Counter to r_01 and r_06: pre-empt plaintiff scaffolding by publishing fuller D&O indemnification disclosures and granting the audit committee an explicit FCPA/AECA cultural-compliance mandate with public charter changes. Reduces the discount that plaintiff bars currently get from public 2024 admissions + 2001 recidivism citation, and signals to Delaware Chancery that board oversight is now structurally enforced.